Can we trust the current position?
An evidence-based assessment of governance capability, maturity, strengths and limitations.
Client deliverables
What you receive.
Decision-ready outputs that show the governance position, explain what matters and provide a practical path to stronger organisational capability.
The executive answer
Five questions the deliverables are designed to answer.
Where are we exposed?
Material gaps in accountability, evidence, architecture, risk and governance follow-through.
What should leadership decide?
A clear set of executive decisions, conditions, owners and accepted limitations.
What should happen first?
A prioritised 90-day improvement plan and sequenced 12-month roadmap.
How will improvement continue?
A transition plan with review conditions and, where warranted, a VTGO pathway.
Core deliverables
A controlled set of client outputs.
Executive Summary
The current position, principal strengths, material findings, decisions required and recommended next steps in concise executive language.
Board Technology Governance Report
A board-ready view of capability, oversight, material uncertainty, accountability and governance priorities.
Capability and Maturity Profile
A contextual current-versus-required view, supported by rationale, evidence confidence and explicit limitations.
Governance Heat Map
A visual summary of material capability gaps and priorities, used to support rather than replace analysis.
Findings, Risk and Decision Register
Traceable material findings, organisational implications, required decisions, owners and references.
90-Day Improvement Plan
The smallest set of immediate actions needed to establish ownership, evidence and governance momentum.
12-Month Governance Roadmap
A realistic sequence of capability improvements, dependencies, milestones and review points.
Executive Presentation and Transition Plan
A facilitated decision discussion and documented transition into implementation or recurring governance.
Design standard
Every output must help management act.
Executive first
Written for decisions, not to display consulting activity.
Evidence based
Material conclusions remain connected to source and limitations.
Capability focused
Recommendations strengthen the organisation, not a technology product.
Implementation ready
Actions include purpose, owner, priority, dependencies and review conditions.
Optional client overview
A concise service brief is available during proposal discussions.
The detailed project plan, responsibility model, evidence request and acceptance criteria are configured for each engagement. They are supplied during proposal and mobilisation rather than published as a generic commitment.
Adnet’s internal capability model, scoring calibration, workflows, AI agents, benchmarks and quality controls remain proprietary.
Technology Governance Assessment Service Overview
Controlled client document supplied with an approved proposal.
Available from Adnet on requestA useful first conversation
Need a board-ready view of technology governance?
Begin with the concern or decision in front of you. We will determine the smallest useful assessment scope.